Boris Fassbender vs Cedric Stanke Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In second serve performance over the last six months, Fassbender slightly leads Stanke with 48.11% of points won compared to Stanke's 47.78%. Does this give Fassbender an edge statistically? Yes, but it is marginal.
• Both players are closely matched in returning second serves, yet Stanke shows a slight lead with 46.2% compared to Fassbender's 46.07%.
• When examining first serve returns, Stanke performs better, winning 24.49% versus Fassbender's 21.33%. Could this be a decisive factor? For return games, it certainly is.
• Under pressure, Stanke has a stronger breakpoint defense, saving 59.52% compared to Fassbender's 54.55%—an important factor for in-game pressure situations.
• Looking at match outcomes over the past year, Stanke leads with a 55.56% win rate, while Fassbender stands at 42.86%, highlighting an overall stronger performance from Stanke.
• On familiar surfaces, Stanke excels on Hard courts with a 58% success rate, whereas Fassbender shows stronger results on Clay at 58%.
• Both players mostly compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF level, with Stanke showing a better win rate of 55.56% compared to Fassbender's 42.86%.
• Opponent quality analysis shows Stanke competes against higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 136.49 compared to Fassbender's 165.
• If this match reaches a deciding set, Stanke's record hints at a probable victory, having won 40% of such sets, while Fassbender has not prevailed in any.
• In terms of breakpoint conversion, Fassbender has a substantial advantage at 40% compared to Stanke's 20.93%, crucial for capitalizing on opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (June 24, 2025, UTC):

The comparison of recent performance metrics suggests a closely contested match between Stanke and Fassbender. Stanke demonstrates consistent outcomes in pressure-driven situations, winning a higher percentage of matches against generally stronger opponents.

While Fassbender holds a slight edge in second serve performance and break-point conversion, Stanke shows superiority in returning both first and second serves, and a significant advantage in deciding set scenarios.

Given these observations, the likelihood of winning rests slightly more with Stanke, who appears to harness a broader set of strengths tailored for crucial match moments.